Conversations in Management
Stanton
made this remark during testimony before the Senate Judiciary
Committee in January 1892. The speech was the capstone of a
career that began with the first women’s rights convention in
Seneca Falls, New York, forty years earlier. There, she boldly
read the Declaration of Sentiments declaring equal rights
for women. She modeled the document on the Declaration of
Independence and in it made a strong case for female suffrage.
The Seneca Falls convention was a turning point for Stanton.
Already an active abolitionist, she saw many parallels between
the status of women—particularly married women—and the victims
of slavery. The extreme limits on a woman’s rights, or
self-sovereignty, radicalized her views and led her to seek
far more than simple voting rights. She ardently spoke out in
favor of a woman’s full rights regarding property, income,
employment and child custody. Even more polarizing she spoke out
in favor of liberalized divorce laws and the right of women to
use birth control or, as she called it, voluntary motherhood.
Then, as
today, contentious social and political issues generated a good
deal of discussion, argument and angst. Then, as today, that’s
about the full extent of most folk’s involvement in the issues.
But Stanton was different. She saw inequities and took
responsibility for doing something about it. She started by
organizing the Seneca Falls convention and traveling locally to
speak out in favor of women’s rights. As the movement gained
momentum, she became one of the first to balance home and
career. Choosing to remain at home with her young children; she
none-the-less stayed active by publishing numerous articles and
writing speeches for Susan B. Anthony. After her children were
grown, she assumed key leadership roles in the National Woman’s
Suffrage Association, the International Council of Women and the
National American Woman Suffrage Association. In 1868 she joined
the Lyceum Circuit, where for the next twelve years she would
travel the country giving speeches such as, “Our Girls,” “Our
Boys,” “Marriage and Divorce,” and “The Bible and Women’s
Rights.” Underpinning all her activities was a bedrock belief in
the common rights of everyone. She believed that with equal
rights came responsibility—the responsibility to make your way
in the world on the basis of your own merit.
Assuming responsibility is a mark of
character. It’s an indication that you’re willing to think
through a situation and come to a decision about it. It also
means you’re willing to stand by your decision and accept the
consequences that follow—good or bad. Yet even a negative
consequence isn’t too hard on someone willing to accept
responsibility for their actions. When things go wrong, they
acknowledge it as a part of life, figure what to do better the
next time and then move on. They have confidence in themselves,
in their ability to recover and in their ultimate ability to
succeed. We all know what the alternative looks like. Those
unwilling to accept responsibility for themselves tend to whine,
blame, complain and act helpless when faced with even minor
difficulties. They have an overwhelming and unattractive need to
be rescued—from life and from themselves. If you’re in any kind
of leadership role, a key responsibility is helping your folks
assume responsibility. You may have to coach, encourage and
perhaps even cajole them, but everyone will benefit. Try it out.
Promote responsibility. Who knows, you might even start a
movement.
—Ebert
Read More CM in the Archives! |
Find More In The Archives!
|